Modelling banding effect and tag loss for Little Penguins, Eudyptula minor, using Matlab

Abstract

We present a framework for using Matlab to analyse mark-recapture data arising from studies that use more than one type of tag to mark animals for later identification. We consider life history data collected for groups of single and double tagged animals. We include tag loss probabilities in the likelihood function, which removes a common source of bias in the estimation of survival rates. We show how the formation of appropriate summary statistics, and use of vectorisation, vastly improves speed in computing the likelihood function. We illustrate our methods by analysing seven years of mark-recapture data for 2483 Little Penguins Eudyptula minor on Phillip Island in south-eastern Australia. References

• D. G. Ainley, R. E. LeResche, and W. J. L. Sladen. Breeding Biology of the Adelie Penguin. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1983.
• A. N. Arnason and K. H. Mills. Bias and loss of precision due to tag loss in Jolly--Seber estimates for mark-recapture experiments. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 38:1077--1095, 1981. doi:10.1139/f81-148
• R. J. H. Beverton and S. J. Holt. On the dynamics of exploited fish populations. Fishery Investigations Series II, 19:1--533, 1957. doi:10.2307/1440619
• C. J. A. Bradshaw, R. J. Barker, and L. S. Davis. Modeling tag loss in New Zealand fur seal pups. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 5(4):475--485, 2000. doi:10.2307/1400661
• E. A. Catchpole. Ted Catchpole's Personal Home Page. http://pems.unsw.adfa.edu.au//staff/profiles/catchpole_t.
• E. A. Catchpole, S. N. Freeman, B. J. T. Morgan, and M. P. Harris. Integrated recovery/recapture data analysis. Biometrics, 54:33--46, 1998. doi:10.2307/2533993
• E. A. Catchpole, B. J. T. Morgan, and G. Tavecchia. A new method for analysing discrete life-history data with missing covariate values. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, B, 70(2):445--460, 2008. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00644.x
• P. B. Conn, W. L. Kendall, and M. D. Samuel. A general model for the analysis of mark-resight, mark-recapture, and band-recovery data under tag loss. Biometrics, 60:900--909, 2004. doi:10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00245.x
• B. M. Culik, R. P. Wilson, and R. Bannasch. Flipper-bands on penguins: what is the cost of a life-long commitment? Marine Ecology Progress Series, 98:209--214, 1993. doi:10.3354/meps098209
• P. Dann and J. M. Cullen. Survival, patterns of reproduction and lifetime reproductive output in the Little Blue Penguins (Eudyptula minor) on Phillip Island, Victoria, Australia. In L. S. Davis and J. T. Darby, editors, Penguin Biology, pages 63--84. Academic Press, San Diego, 1990.
• P. Dann, J. M. Cullen, and R. Jessop. Cost of reproduction in Little Penguins. In P. Dann, F. I. Norman, and P. N. Reilly, editors, The Penguins: Ecology and Management, pages 39--55. Surrey Beatty, Sydney, 1995.
• P. Dann, L. A. Sidhu, R. Jessop, L. Renwick, M. Healy, P. Collins, B. Baker, and E. A. Catchpole. The effects of flipper bands on the survival of adult Little Penguins Eudyptula minor. The Auk. In review.
• G. Froget, M. Gauthier-Clerc, Y. Le Maho, and Y. Handrich. Is penguin banding harmless? Polar Biology, 20:409--413, 1998. doi:10.1007/s003000050322
• M. Gauthier-Clerc, J.-P. Gendner, C. A. Ribic, W. R. Fraser, E. J. Woehler, S. Descamps, C. Gilly, C. Le Bohec, and Y. Le Maho. Long-term effects of flipper bands on penguins. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B (Supplement), Biology Letters, 271:423--426, 2004. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2004.0201
• S. R. Johnson, J. O. Schiek, and G. F. Searing. Neck band loss rates for lesser snow geese. Journal of Wildlife Management, 59:747--752, 1995. doi:10.2307/3801951
• R. King, S. P. Brooks, and T. Coulson. Analyzing complex capture-recapture data in the presence of individual and temporal covariates and model uncertainty. Biometrics, 64:1187--1195, 2008. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.00991.x
• J.-D. Lebreton, K. P. Burnham, J. Clobert, and D. R. Anderson. Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: a unified approach with case studies. Ecological Monographs, 62:67--118, 1992. doi:10.2307/2937171
• S. L. Petersen, G. M. Branch, D. G. Ainley, P. D. Boersma, J. Cooper, and E. J. Woehler. Is flipper banding of penguins a problem? Marine Ornithology, 33:75--79, 2005. http://marineornithology.org/PDF/33_2/33_2_75-79.pdf
• P. N. Reilly and J. M. Cullen. The Little Penguin Eudyptula minor in Victoria. I: Mortality of adults. Emu, 79:97--102, 1979. doi:10.1071/MU9790097
• P. N. Reilly and J. M. Cullen. The Little Penguin Eudyptula minor in Victoria. II: Breeding. Emu, 81:1--19, 1981. doi:10.1071/MU9810001
• P. N. Reilly and J. M. Cullen. The Little Penguin Eudyptula minor in Victoria. IV: Moult. Emu, 83:94--98, 1983. doi:10.1071/MU9830094
• C. Saraux, C. Le Bohec, J. M. Durant, V. A. Viblanc, M. Gauthier-Clerc, D. Beaune, Y.-H. Park, N. G. Yoccoz, N. C. Stenseth, and Y. Le Maho. Reliability of flipper-banded penguins as indicators of climate change. Nature, 469:203--206, 13 January 2011. doi:10.1038/nature09630
• G. A. F. Seber. The Estimation of Animal Abundance and Related Parameters. Griffin, London, 2nd edition, 1982.
• L. A. Sidhu, E. A. Catchpole, and P. Dann. Mark-recapture-recovery modeling and age-related survival in Little Penguins Eudyptula minor. The Auk, 124:815--827, 2007. doi:10.1642/0004-8038(2007)124[815:MMAASI]2.0.CO;2
• W. T. Stobo and J. K. Horne. Tag loss in grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) and potential effects on population estimates. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 72:555--561, 1994. doi:10.1139/z94-075
• R. J. Treble, R. W. Day, and T. J. Quinn II. Detection and effects on mortality estimates of changes in tag loss. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 50:1435--1441, 1993. doi:10.1139/f93-164
• J. A. Wetherall. Analysis of double-tagging experiments. Fishery Bulletin, 80:687--701, 1982. http://swfsc.noaa.gov/publications/CR/1982/8247.PDF
• Y. Xiao. A general model for estimating tag-specific shedding rates and tag interactions from exact or pooled times at liberty for a double tagging experiment. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 53:1852--1861, 1996. doi:10.1139/cjfas-53-8-1852